Service · AI Development & Integration

AI features that actually ship to production

Eval-driven prompts, RAG with citations, multi-provider routing, observability built in. AI you can trust at 3am — not a demo that breaks under real users.

support.bluesky.health/playground
AAanyajust now
Are my refills auto-renewed before I run out?
search_kb{ q: "refill auto-renewal policy" } 0.4s
#FAQ-217 Refill auto-renewal#POLICY-04 Subscription billing#FAQ-184 Pause / skip orders
SupportAI grounded · 3 sources
96 / 100
Eval pass
1.6s
P95 first-token
0%
Auto-deflected
100%
PII redacted
Releasing rag-v3 · f8d2a1bsupport.bluesky.healthjust now
What we build

Six AI shapes, one engineering discipline

Whatever shape your AI feature takes, the discipline is the same — eval-driven, traced, multi-provider, with PII handled correctly.

AI assistants & chatbots

Customer-support, sales-enablement, employee-help-desk chatbots — grounded in your knowledge base, escalating to humans correctly, with full audit trail.

RAG & semantic search

Vector-indexed knowledge bases — accurate retrieval over your docs, contracts, support tickets, internal wiki. Cited sources, no hallucination, evals included.

Agents & automation

Multi-step agents that operate within guardrails — schedule meetings, classify emails, run reports, file tickets. Tool-use traces logged for review.

AI-augmented workflows

LLM-in-the-loop workflows for ops teams — invoice extraction, contract review, compliance flagging. Human approval gates at every critical step.

Voice AI

Real-time voice agents for support and outbound — Whisper / Deepgram for STT, ElevenLabs / Cartesia for TTS, sub-second turn-taking, transcripts saved.

Custom model fine-tuning

When prompting isn't enough — supervised fine-tuning, DPO, LoRA adapters. Full eval harness, dataset labeling, drift monitoring after deploy.

Tech we build with

The stack we run in production

Frontier models with multi-provider routing, real evals, real observability — not a thin wrapper around one API.

Frontier models
  • OpenAI GPT
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Open-source via HF
Orchestration
  • LangChain · LangGraph
  • Vercel AI SDK
Vector DBs
  • Pinecone
  • pgvector
  • Qdrant · Weaviate
Languages & APIs
  • Python
  • TypeScript
  • FastAPI
Eval & ops
  • LangSmith · LangFuse
  • Eval harness · regressions
Cloud
  • AWS Bedrock
  • Vercel · edge inference
How we ship

From idea to production AI in six accountable steps

Every phase has a written deliverable, an eval gate, and a sign-off.

  1. 01

    Use-case scoping & ROI

    Discovery

    What problem are we solving, what does success look like (deflection %, time saved, accuracy), what's the alternative, what's the cost ceiling. We say no when AI isn't the right tool.

    • Problem statement & target metric
    • Cost-per-call ceiling
    • "No" if scripted logic is enough
    • Risk + fallback plan
  2. 02

    Data prep & guardrails

    Data

    Knowledge sources cleaned, chunked, embedded. PII redaction, access controls, source attribution. Guardrails for hallucination, prompt-injection, off-topic responses.

    • Knowledge ingestion pipeline
    • PII redaction + access scoping
    • Output guardrails & safety filters
    • Fallback to human escalation
  3. 03

    Prompt eng + tool wiring

    Prompting

    Iterate prompts against eval set. For agents: tool definitions, JSON-schema validation, retry logic, max-step caps. We commit prompts in version control, like code.

    • Eval-driven prompt iteration
    • Tool definitions + JSON schema
    • Retry / fallback logic
    • Prompts in version control
  4. 04

    Eval harness + regression

    Evals

    Automated eval suite — golden test set, judge LLMs for soft-eval, regression detection on every prompt / model change. No more "I tried it once and it worked".

    • Golden eval set (≥100 cases)
    • LLM-judge for soft criteria
    • Regression detection in CI
    • Per-feature eval gates
  5. 05

    Deploy + observability

    Production

    Streaming responses, semantic caching, fall-throughs, multi-provider routing (cost / latency tradeoffs), full LangSmith / LangFuse traces, cost dashboards, drift monitors.

    • Streaming + cache layer
    • Multi-provider routing
    • LangSmith / LangFuse tracing
    • Cost dashboards + drift alerts
  6. 06

    Iterate, retrain, monitor

    Ongoing

    Production traces fed back into the eval set. Model upgrades tested in shadow before promotion. Quarterly retraining if you're fine-tuning. Cost optimisation reviews.

    • Production → eval feedback loop
    • Shadow A/B for model upgrades
    • Quarterly cost review
    • Drift / hallucination monitoring
Featured project

From 12-day SLA to 8 minutes. Real numbers.

Healthcare · LLM customer support

BlueSky Pharma SupportAI

The challenge

12-day SLA on patient queries via email. 6-person team manually handling 800 tickets/week, repetitive responses, no audit. PII a compliance concern.

What we shipped

RAG-grounded support agent over their FAQ + product docs, PII-redacted, human-in-the-loop on medical queries. Deflection 64%, response time 12 days → 8 minutes, audit trail on every reply.

64%Auto-deflected
12d → 8mResponse time
100%PII-redacted
The runtime profile

Quality we commit to in writing

Targets we instrument, alert on, and ship in the production runbook.

0/100
Eval pass-rate
0%
Faithfulness
0
PII redaction
0%
Auto-deflect
The code we ship

Streaming, RAG, citations — production-grade

Tool-using LLM with grounded retrieval, streaming response, model-agnostic routing. Same shape every project.

app/api/support/route.tsVercel AI SDK · Claude · RAG
 1import { streamText, tool } from "ai" 2import { anthropic } from "@ai-sdk/anthropic" 3 4export async function POST(req: Request) { 5  const { messages }awaitreq.json(); 6 7  returnstreamText({ 8    model:  anthropic("claude-opus-4-7"), 9    system: SYSTEM_PROMPT,10    messages,11    tools: { search_kb: tool({12      description: "Search BlueSky FAQ + product docs",13      execute:   async({ q }) =>vector.search(q)14    }) },15  }).toDataStreamResponse();16}
Why teams choose us

How we're different from an AI startup wrapper

DimensionNextGenUsTypical AI wrapper shop
Eval harness from day one ≥100-case golden set, regression on every change"It worked when I tried it"
Hallucination guardrails Cited sources, output validators, kill-switchFingers crossed
Tool-use observability LangSmith / LangFuse traces · every call auditedconsole.log() in production
Cost & latency control Multi-provider routing, semantic cache, ceilingsSingle GPT-4o, no caching
PII / compliance Redaction, access scoping, audit trailSends raw customer data to OpenAI
Source code & weights 100% transferred · prompts versioned in your repoLocked in their wrapper service
What you can expect

Outcomes we commit to in writing

6 – 14 wkTypical AI feature timeline
100 casesEval set baseline
P95 < 2sStreaming first-token target
−40%Avg cost vs naive prompting
Common questions

Things people ask before they sign

  • Build with AI when you have a real problem with measurable success criteria — deflection, accuracy, hours saved — and you&apos;re willing to invest in evals. Skip AI if scripted logic, search, or a workflow tool would do it for half the cost. We&apos;ll tell you when AI isn&apos;t the right answer.

Start your software project today

Ready to build something great?

Whether you need a custom web app, a mobile product, or want to explore our HRMS and SFA platforms — let's talk. No commitments. Just a conversation about your goals.